
My friend Claire just turned me on to this article by one of my favourite ever columnists, Charlie Brooker.
It’s brilliant funny, incisive and pretty sweary, as I’ve come to expect from him. But beneath the jokey central premise that men are ruining the world and that women should take over *everything* lies a fundamental problem. And it gives me a chance to get something off my chest that I’ve been meaning to for ages.
Y’see, I agree in principle with Charlie. There aren’t enough women in positions of real power, and the world would be a better place if it wasn’t so patriarchal. But unfortunately the women that do get to power (or try to get to power) almost always seem to do it by emulating male traits. I honestly can’t think of many women I know who have got to the top in their game without apparently resorting to being battleaxes, bullies or bitches. They put on a mask of aggression that makes them harsh and unapproachable. Take the two women who’ve been sat on the panel of Dragon’s Den; Deborah Meaden and Rachel Elnaugh.
I’m not entirely sure I saw either of them crack a smile once in all the eipsodes I watched. And they seemed to be particularly unpleasant to female “contestants” who tried to appeal to them on a feminine level. I’m sure both of them are lovely in real life, but when in business mode they lose all the humour, warmth, and approachability that are their strengths. But because we live in a male dominated society they are probably seen as weaknesses, because us blokes have made aggression, suppression and bullying the de facto modes of business.
Of course, these are all generalisations, and maybe there’s not a fundamental problem in Brooker’s proposal – maybe we just need to change the way we see leaders & entrepreneurs. I’d just love to see a new generation of women leaders coming through who were brilliant, warm, friendly and aren’t scared to lead as women, and not as “men in dresses”.




